Josh Wieder

Scams focused on stealing tax refunds remain highly profitable, despite the fact that they are well known and understood by security professionals and the general public , and have been for years. A variety of distribution methods are used, with the common threads being the use of IRS logos and bureaucratic-sounding language to convince users to click a link, download and execute a file and/or send personally identifying information like a Social Security number. A recent example of one such a scam that I came across is a damning illustration of the failure of online service providers to protect users from obvious and simple malware distribution methods. In the example I wish to discuss today, the distribution method was a spammed email that on a small ISP's installation of SpamAssassin (note: I am not an admin or employee of this system; I'm a customer) received an X-Spam-Status score of 5.3 after being flagged with the following variables: X-Spam-Status: No, score=5.3 re

I received a somewhat horrifying email from Electronic Arts in reference to my Origin account yesterday : I pissed my pants a little. The email definitely originated from EA, and there is very little resembling a phishing scam in the process they use to update security setting. I haven't used my Origin account for anything other than playing games on Xbox that require one... I haven't played my Xbox in months. There is no payment information associated with my Origin account, and the login information for it is not associated with any other accounts. There is nothing in the account activity to suggest purchases have been made. I would be a lot more comfortable with this sort of thing if the email was specific about what the issue was. So I am wondering a bit as to why I received this email. Has anyone else been receiving these emails? This whole "standard systems analysis" strikes me as .... suspicious. UPDATE: I've confirmed that I am not the only O

This morning I received an interesting message from someone I haven't heard from in a while through email. The subject line was "FIND PDF COPY" (in all caps). Inside the body of the message, embedded within the normal garbage footer attached by their email client, was this: I may very well have gotten suckered into this one if it weren't for the all caps subject line. The person who ostensibly sent me this message is, somewhat ironically, the type of person to include all caps text in their email - but there was something a little too weird about the grammatical solipsism intrinsic to the phrase "FIND PDF COPY" even for this supposed sender. So I took the two seconds out of my day to hover my mouse over the link and, what would you know, dropbox was not the target at all. The link forwarded to "goto-saketen.com" instead. Just to be sure I took a look at the headers of the message. This did in fact come from the sender it claimed to, althou

A few million of the emails below are making the rounds. The phishing emails attempt to be from NACHA, an ACH trade organization, and tell readers that a recent direct deposit was declined and to just DOWNLOAD THIS SOFTWARE to CLAIM YOUR FREE CASH NOW!!!11! NACHA itself is aware of the tomfoolery: The From: and Reply To: headers are both forged in this email. Because of this, I suspect that jamnaytac.com, who is included in the Reply To: but now the From: is going to be receiving some grief / spam complaints that have nothing to do with them. So who is responsible for this? Below I have included the email headers for this spam message. This one is mildly interesting because it makes some shallow attempts at being deceptive to a lazy reader. When reading headers, what we are interested in mostly are the Received: lines. Almost every other item (mouth breathers: note the almost) can be forged. Received: lines can be forged to, but only by adding lines that should not be